A passionate historian and travel writer specializing in Italian cultural heritage and ancient Roman history.
As global leaders convene in the Brazilian Amazon for Cop30, it is crucial to review how we are faring together in cutting worldwide emissions of greenhouse gases.
Despite three decades of United Nations climate conferences, nearly 50% of the carbon dioxide accumulated in the atmosphere after the dawn of industrialization has been released since 1990. Coincidentally, 1990 marked the release of the First Assessment Report by the IPCC, which confirmed the threat of anthropogenic climate change. As scientists work on the Seventh Assessment Report, they do so knowing that their work remains eclipsed by political agendas. Regardless of well-intentioned efforts, the planet is still far from the path to prevent catastrophic climate change.
Recent data indicate that CO2 concentrations reached a new peak of 423.9 ppm in 2024, with the growth rate from the previous year surging by the biggest annual rise since record-keeping started in the late 1950s. According to the international carbon monitoring initiative, 90% of total global CO2 emissions in last year originated from the combustion of carbon-based energy sources, while the other tenth resulted from land-use changes such as deforestation and forest fires.
While the rise in fossil CO2 emissions in recent times was propelled by increased use of natural gas and petroleumârepresenting over half of global emissionsâthe use of coal also attained a historic peak, constituting 41%. Despite the previous climate summit's evaluation urging nations to move beyond carbon fuels, collective plans still intend to produce more than double the amount of fossil fuels in the year 2030 than aligns with limiting planet heating to 1.5C, with ongoing drilling of gas rationalized as a less polluting transition fuel.
Rather than concentrating on financial motivators to speed up the phase-out of fossil fuels, environmental strategies are heavily reliant on feel-good eco-positive approaches that seek to neutralize carbon emissions by afforestation rather than cutting factory discharges. Although conserving, enlarging, and rehabilitating natural carbon sinks like forests and wetlands is inherently good, research has shown that there is insufficient territory to reach the worldwide target of carbon neutrality using ecological methods by themselves.
Approximately 1 billion hectaresâan area bigger than the USAâis required to meet carbon neutrality commitments. Over forty percent of this area would need to be transformed from current applications like food production to carbon sequestration projects by 2060 at an unprecedented rate.
Even if this regenerative utopia could be realized, woodlands take time to mature and are susceptible to fires, so they cannot be considered as a fast or lasting CO2 retention method, especially in a rapidly shifting climate. As severe temperatures and aridity affect larger regions, these sincere attempts could actually go up in smoke.
Scientific evidence indicates that about half of the total CO2 emitted annually remains in the atmosphere, while the remainder is taken up by oceans and terrestrial systems. As the planet warms, these natural carbon sinks are losing efficiency at soaking up CO2, meaning that more carbon builds up in the atmosphere, intensifying global warming. Shifting the reduction responsibility onto the agricultural and forest sectors effectively excuses the fossil fuel industry from the pressure to cut pollution in the near future.
Reaching net zero by 2050 requires carbon dioxide removal (CDR), which currently relies almost exclusively on terrestrial methods to absorb excess carbon from the atmosphere. Polluters can easily purchase offsets to counterbalance their discharges and proceed with normal operations. Meanwhile, the planetary heat imbalance caused by the burning of fossil fuels continues to further destabilise the global climate system. In effect, we are adding more carbon debt to our global account, leaving future generations with an insurmountable burden.
To limit the scale and length of overshoot the Paris Agreement temperature goals, the planet eventually needs to go well beyond the balancing impact of net zero and begin to remove cumulative historical emissions to reach net negative emissions.
According to the latest numbers from the Global Carbon Project, vegetation-based CDR is presently absorbing the equal of about five percent of annual fossil carbon dioxide emissions, while engineered carbon extraction accounts for only about a tiny fraction of the carbon released from fossil fuels. Optimistic industry estimates suggest around 0.1% of total global emissions. Without meaning to be controversial, the policy twisting of carbon neutrality is a deceptive gap that distracts from the research-based necessity to eradicate the main source of our overheating planetâcarbon-based energy.
While this scientific reality should dominate talks at Cop30, history indicates that gradual, cautious steps and political kowtowing will prevail. Vague statements of future ambition will continue to delay the pressing requirement for definite short-term measures. Until policymakers are brave enough to implement carbon pricing to terminate the age of hydrocarbons, we are adding more and more carbon to the air, worsening the physical catastrophe currently happening all around us.
The dilemma we confront is straightforward: genuinely respond to the scientific reality of our crisis or suffer the consequences of this deep ethical lapse for centuries to come.
A passionate historian and travel writer specializing in Italian cultural heritage and ancient Roman history.